|
The annual International Law Colloquium sponsored by St. John's Center for International and Comparative Law brings leading scholars to campus to present their works to students and faculty. This year, we're pleased to welcome:
|
14 March 2016
Spring 2016 International Law Colloquium
04 March 2016
Louisiana Law Review Symposium on the Future of the Civil Law
Louisiana—as the lone civil law jurisdiction in the United States—has been instrumental
in developing and maintaining one of the major legal traditions in the world, the civil law, in the English language. Indeed, having as its source Roman and Canon law, with Spanish and French influences dating back centuries, the civil law has developed over time to best suit the needs of the citizenry at the relevant time period. The development of this venerated legal tradition in English, particularly in Louisiana, has contributed to its influence and accessibility around the globe.
The continued viability of the civil law in Louisiana is possible because of the hard work of scholars throughout the state, and particularly the work of the great legal minds of the LSU Law Center. One such legal scholar is our very own Alain Levasseur, who has worked diligently to ensure that the civil law is accessible in English in Louisiana and abroad. This accessibility enables legal scholars from around the globe to share experiences and ideas regarding the history and future of the civil law tradition.
Please join the Louisiana Law Review, the Center of Civil Law Studies, and the Paul M. Hebert Law Center as we celebrate the development of the civil law in Louisiana, the accomplishments of Professor Levasseur, and the future of the civil law around the world.
For more information and to register,
in developing and maintaining one of the major legal traditions in the world, the civil law, in the English language. Indeed, having as its source Roman and Canon law, with Spanish and French influences dating back centuries, the civil law has developed over time to best suit the needs of the citizenry at the relevant time period. The development of this venerated legal tradition in English, particularly in Louisiana, has contributed to its influence and accessibility around the globe.
The continued viability of the civil law in Louisiana is possible because of the hard work of scholars throughout the state, and particularly the work of the great legal minds of the LSU Law Center. One such legal scholar is our very own Alain Levasseur, who has worked diligently to ensure that the civil law is accessible in English in Louisiana and abroad. This accessibility enables legal scholars from around the globe to share experiences and ideas regarding the history and future of the civil law tradition.
Please join the Louisiana Law Review, the Center of Civil Law Studies, and the Paul M. Hebert Law Center as we celebrate the development of the civil law in Louisiana, the accomplishments of Professor Levasseur, and the future of the civil law around the world.
For more information and to register,
Venue: Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Schedule of Events
Opening Remarks
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM
Opening Remarks
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM
Panel 1: The Law of Obligations in Louisiana and Abroad
8:15 AM - 10:00 AM
8:15 AM - 10:00 AM
Break 10:00 AM - 10:15 AM
Commentator: Civil Code Drafting Styles and Conflicts of Law
10:15 AM - 11:00 AM
10:15 AM - 11:00 AM
Lunch 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Panel 2: Translation of the Civil Law
12:00 PM – 1:15 PM
12:00 PM – 1:15 PM
Commentator: Challenges and Rewards of Teaching Comparative Law in the Commonwealth Caribbean
1:15 PM - 2:00 PM
1:15 PM - 2:00 PM
Break 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM
Commentator: U.S. Discovery and Foreign Blocking Statutes
2:15 PM - 3:00 PM
2:15 PM - 3:00 PM
Presentations
Opening RemarksMelissa Lonegrass: Professor, Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University
Panel 1: The Law of Obligations in Louisiana and AbroadParticipants will discuss the development of the law of Obligations in Louisiana and in France.
Ronald Scalise: A.D. Freeman Professor of Civil Law, Tulane Law School
David Gruning: Professor, Loyola University College of Law
Michel Séjean: Professor, Université de Bretagne-Sud, France
Mustapha Mekki: Professor, Université Paris 13
Ronald Scalise: A.D. Freeman Professor of Civil Law, Tulane Law School
David Gruning: Professor, Loyola University College of Law
Michel Séjean: Professor, Université de Bretagne-Sud, France
Mustapha Mekki: Professor, Université Paris 13
Commentator: Civil Code Drafting Styles and Conflicts of LawProfessor Symeonides will discuss the extent to which judges may deviate from the text of a statute by examining recent statutes in which the legislature itself authorizes such a deviation.
Symeon Symeonides: Professor, Willamette University College of Law
Symeon Symeonides: Professor, Willamette University College of Law
Panel 2: Translating the Civil LawParticipants will discuss how the civil law was translated using French and Spanish sources and how the law has been translated contemporarily.
Agustín Parise: Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
Randy Trahan: Professor, Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University
Randy Trahan: Professor, Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University
Commentator: Challenges and Rewards of Teaching Comparative Law in the Commonwealth CaribbeanProfessor Ostroukh will discuss the challenges she has faced in teaching comparative law at a university in the West Indies, and will focus on how certain characteristics of the region have shaped her experience of teaching comparative law.
Asya Ostroukh: Senior Lecturer, Cave Hill Campus of the University of the West Indies in Barbados
Asya Ostroukh: Senior Lecturer, Cave Hill Campus of the University of the West Indies in Barbados
Commentator: U.S. Discovery and Foreign Blocking StatutesProfessor Curran will discuss the relationship between U.S. discovery practices and
blocking statutes in France and Germany that have for decades impeded discovery efforts by U.S. entities.
Vivian Grosswald Curran: Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Law
blocking statutes in France and Germany that have for decades impeded discovery efforts by U.S. entities.
Vivian Grosswald Curran: Professor, University of Pittsburgh School of Law
Also featured in Volume 76, Issue IV of the Louisiana Law Review, Liber Amicorum: Professor Alain A. Levasseur, without presentation:
Nicholas Kasirer: Justice of the Court of Appeal for Québec
Jean-Louis Baudouin: Counsel, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
Nicholas Kasirer: Justice of the Court of Appeal for Québec
Jean-Louis Baudouin: Counsel, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
27 February 2016
You are invited to the book launch for
Volume I of the series
STUDIES IN THE CONTRACT LAWS OF ASIA
Remedies for Breach of Contract
Edited by
Mindy Chen-Wishart
(Oxford University, (fractional) National University of Singapore)
Alexander Loke
(City University Hong Kong)
Burton Ong
(National University of Singapore)
to be held in
The Cube Lecture Room, Oxford University Faculty of Law
St Cross Building, Oxford, OX1 3UL
on
3 March 2016, 5.20-6.45pm
Speakers:Dean Professor Anne Davies Welcome and introduction
Professor Mindy Chen-Wishart Why no sensible people would attempt such a project
Lord Toulson Comment
Professor Hugh Beale Comment
The event will be followed by drinks
Please RSVP to: mindy.chen-wishart@law.ox.ac.uk
11 January 2016
Juris Diversitas Conference: CALL FOR PAPERS PROLONGED
2016 Annual Conference:
Unity and/or Diversity
May 30 to June 1, 2016
Theme: Comparative legal studies have long been perceived as an
engine pulling legal traditions and systems towards
convergence, harmonization, and unification. Today, legal pluralism
pushes towards the recognition of human and social diversity.
Does this mean that we have to choose between unity and
diversity, Jus unum or juris diversitas? To what extent do pluralistic
societies embrace or reject harmonization and uniformity,
or simply ignore them? Do we unify or add layers, increasing the
complexity of legal orders? Does history reflect a move from
diversity to unity or an ongoing conflict between the two? What
makes unity successful or sustainable? This is an invitation to
discuss, in an interdisciplinary way, the development of laws and
social norms, in the dialectical tension between the ontological
unity of human beings and mankind and the plurality of individual
aspirations and social arrangements.
Submissions: Panel proposals are strongly
encouraged, as is the participation of doctoral students and
scholars from outside the discipline of law. While parallel sessions
of three twenty-minute presentations will be used, we
encourage more original session structures.
Proposals should be in English or in French. Proposals of
circa 250 words (or 1000 words for panel proposals) should
be submitted to Professor Salvatore Mancuso at
JDLSU2016@gmail.com by February 29, 2016
with a short biography listing major or relevant publications.
Make this a single Word document with minimal formatting,
so that proposal and biography can be copied easily into
the conference program.
Registration fees: €200 or €125 for Juris Diversitas members paid up
for 2016. Membership and fee payment information is available on
the Juris Diversitas Blog (http://jurisdiversitas.blogspot.com/).
Note that fees don’t cover travel, accommodation, or the
conference dinner (€50).
07 January 2016
NEW FROM MCGILL-QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY PRESS
From
Treaties to Reserves
The
Federal Government and Native Peoples
in Territorial Alberta, 1870-1905
in Territorial Alberta, 1870-1905
D.J.
HALL
How divergent understandings of treaties contributed to a heritage
of distrust.
Though some believe that the Indian treaties of the 1870s achieved
a unity of purpose between the Canadian government and First Nations, in From Treaties to Reserves
D.J. Hall asserts that - as a result of profound cultural differences - each
side interpreted the negotiations differently, leading to conflict and an acute
sense of betrayal when neither group accomplished what the other had
asked.
Hall explores the original intentions behind the government's
policies, illustrates their attempts at cooperation, and clarifies their
actions. While the government believed that the Aboriginal peoples of what is
now southern and central Alberta desired rapid change, the First Nations, in
contrast, believed that the government was committed to supporting the preservation
of their culture while they adapted to change. Government policies
intended to motivate backfired, leading instead to poverty, starvation, and
cultural restriction. Many policies were also culturally insensitive, revealing
misconceptions of Aboriginal people as lazy and over-dependent on government
rations. Yet the first two decades of reserve life still witnessed most First
Nations people participating in reserve economies, many of the first generation
of reserve-born children graduated from schools with some improved ability to
cope with reserve life, and there was also more positive cooperation between
government and First Nations people than is commonly acknowledged.
D.J. Hall
is professor emeritus of Canadian history at the University of
Alberta.
14 December 2015
Forthcoming: Fundamental Labour Rights in China
Fundamental Labour
Rights in China - Legal Implementation and Cultural Logic
Editors: Ulla Liukkunen, Yifeng Chen
Book
Volume 49 2016
Springer.com http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319231556
11 December 2015
Baltimore Conference on The Fate of Scholarship in American Law Schools
CONFERENCE: The Fate of Scholarship in American Law Schools
March 31-April 1, 2016
The University of Baltimore School of Law will host this groundbreaking conference on March 31 and April 1, 2016, at UB’s landmark new John and Frances Angelos Law Center in midtown Baltimore.
As American legal education faces an identity crisis, what will become of scholarship in U.S. law schools? Will it survive the tumult – should it survive – and in what form?
The conference will reexamine first principles of legal scholarship – its value (to legal education, to the legal profession, to society) and its essential aspects – and will survey particular issues of contemporary concern, including emerging scholarly forms and technologies and the relationship among legal scholarship, journalism and new media.
The two-day conference will consist of themed plenary sessions, concurrent small-group sessions, opportunities to interact informally and a keynote address by Jack M. Balkin , Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School.
Questions and sponsorship interest may be directed to the conference organizer, UB School of Law Associate Dean for Faculty Scholarship C.J. Peters , at cpeters@ubalt.edu or410.837.4509.
Online registration for the conference will be available soon. Watch this space for more information.
08 December 2015
Weaving Intellectual Property Policy in Small Island Developing States
Weaving Intellectual Property Policy in Small Island Developing States
Miranda Forsyth and Sue Farran September 2015 | ISBN 978-1-78068-225-9 | xiv + 280 pp. | paperback 62 euros | 74 US dollars | 59 GB pounds This book considers the challenges of creating appropriate intellectual property frameworks in developing economies. It focuses on the small island states of the Pacific region to explore and illustrate the many dilemmas, drawing together considerations of policy, theories of development and law, and empirical studies to suggest solutions and possible strategies. read more... |
07 December 2015
Juris Diversitas Appel à communications: nouvelle date (8 janvier 2016)
APPEL À COMMUNICATIONS
JURIS DIVERSITAS
CONGRÈS ANNUEL
Du 30 mai au 1er juin, 2016
Louisiana State University
Law Center, Baton Rouge, États-Unis
Unité et/ou
Diversité
Colloque international et interdisciplinaire de droit comparé
Thème : Les
études juridiques comparatives ont longtemps été perçues comme un moteur de
convergence, d’harmonisation et d’unification des traditions et des systèmes
juridiques. Le pluralisme juridique met aujourd’hui l’accent sur la
reconnaissance de la diversité humaine et sociale. Faut-il pour autant conclure
que nous devons choisir entre unité et diversité, jus unum ou juris diversitas ?
Dans quelle mesure les sociétés pluralistes embrassent-elles ou rejettent-elles
l’harmonisation et l’uniformité, ou les ignorent-elles tout simplement ?
Unifions-nous vraiment ou ajoutons-nous un niveau supplémentaire de complexité juridique ?
L’histoire révèle-t-elle un mouvement de la diversité vers l’unité ou un
conflit entre les deux ? À quelles conditions l’unité est-elle une
réussite durable ? Ce colloque est une invitation à une discussion
interdisciplinaire du développement du droit et des normes sociales, pris dans
la tension dialectique entre l’unité ontologique des êtres humains et de
l’humanité et la pluralité des aspirations individuelles et des arrangements
sociaux.
Communications : Les propositions de tables rondes et
présentations interdisciplinaires sont encouragées, de même que la
participation de doctorants et d’universitaires non juristes. En plus des
sessions parallèles avec trois orateurs parlant chacun vingt minutes, les
organisateurs invitent à une organisation plus originale.
Les propositions, en anglais ou en français, de 250
mots environ (ou 1.000 pour une table ronde) sont à adresser au Pr Salvatore
Mancuso (JDLSU2016@gmail.com) avant le
8 janvier 2016 avec une brève notice
biographique. Merci de composer la proposition et la notice biographique dans
un seul document Word, avec le minimum de mise en forme, pour faciliter la
composition du programme.
Droits
d’inscription : €200 ou €125 pour les membres de Juris Diversitas à jour de leur
cotisation pour 2016. Les informations relatives à l’adhésion et l’inscription
sont disponibles sur http://jurisdiversitas.blogspot.com/. Les
droits ne couvrent pas les frais de voyage et de logement, ni le banquet du
congrès (€50).
Juris Diversitas Call for Papers: Time Extension (January 8, 2016)
CALL FOR PAPERS
JURIS DIVERSITAS
ANNUAL CONFERENCE
May 30 - June 1, 2016
Louisiana State
University
Law Center, Baton Rouge,
USA
Unity and/or
Diversity
An International, Interdisciplinary Conference on Comparative Law
Theme: Comparative legal studies have long been perceived as an engine pulling legal traditions and systems towards convergence, harmonization, and unification. Today, legal pluralism pushes towards the recognition of human and social diversity. Does this mean that we have to choose between unity and diversity, Jus unum or juris diversitas? To what extent do pluralistic societies embrace or reject harmonization and uniformity, or simply ignore them? Do we unify or add layers, increasing the complexity of legal orders? Does history reflect a move from diversity to unity or an ongoing conflict between the two? What makes unity successful or sustainable? This is an invitation to discuss, in an interdisciplinary way, the development of laws and social norms, in the dialectical tension between the ontological unity of human beings and mankind and the plurality of individual aspirations and social arrangements.
Submissions: Panel proposals and interdisciplinary presentations are strongly encouraged, as is the participation of doctoral students and scholars from outside of the discipline of law. While parallel sessions of three twenty-minute presentations will be used, we encourage more original session structures.
Proposals should be in English or in French. Proposals of circa 250 words (or 1000 words for panel proposals) should be submitted to Professor Salvatore Mancuso at JDLSU2016@gmail.com by January 8, 2016, with a short biography listing major or relevant publications. Make this a single Word document with minimal formatting, so that proposal and biography can be copied easily into the conference program.
Registration fees: €200 or €125 for Juris Diversitas members paid up for 2016. Membership and fee payment information is available on the Juris Diversitas Blog (http://jurisdiversitas.blogspot.com/). Note that fees don’t cover travel, accommodation, or the conference dinner (€50).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






