Intersentia has published Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz and Carina Alcoberro Llivina (eds), National Constitutional Identity and European Integration:
‘National constitutional identity’ has become the new ‘buzz
word’ in European constitutionalism over the past few years. Much has been
written about the concept involving the Member States’ national constitutional
identities: it has been welcomed for (finally) accommodating constitutional
particularities in EU law, demonised for potentially disintegrating the EU, and
wielded as a ‘sword’ by certain constitutional courts. Scholars, judges and
advocates general have rendered the concept currently so fashionable and yet so
ambivalent that an in-depth analysis putting some order into the intense debate
over constitutional identity is warranted.
This collection brings together a series of
contributions from the perspective of both scholars and judges in order to shed
some light into the dark corners of constitutional identity. To this end a
threefold approach has been followed: a conceptual or philosophical approach,
an approach based on EU law, and an analysis of the case-law of several
European courts.
First the book explores what constitutional identity
means and who decides on it. The next contributions analyse (and at times
unveil) the areas that might collide or at least interact with constitutional
identity. Among other issues the authors touch upon EU law primacy, Article 53
of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, EU criminal law and the essential
functions of the State, and the existence of an EU ‘constitutional core’
enjoyable and enforceable through EU citizenship.
Finally, the chapters dealing with the case-law of
European courts on national constitutional identity include the perspective of
various national constitutional courts, such as those of Eastern and Central
European Member States, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the
much less analysed European Court of Human Rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment