Anglo-American Asian Bi-Jural Chthonic Civil Common Community Comparative Continental Culture Customs Development Diffusion Formants Germanic Hegemony Hindu History Humanities Hybridity Hybrids Interdisciplinary Irritant Islamic Ius Law Law-in-Action Legality Lex Living law Philosophy Plurality Micro-jurisdictions Mixed legal systems Mixity Native Nordic Norm Normativity Polyjural Praxiology Reception Roman Society State Stateless Talmudic Traditions Transplant Transsystemic
A core legacy of the Continental juridico-political tradition is the methodological commitment to the idea that law and politics are inextricably tied to one another. On the one hand, law has to be studied in the light of the concrete political dynamics, social forces, and societal movements that make law what it is. On the other hand, the analysis of political processes should be coupled with the study of the legal techniques through which politics exerts its effects on social reality.
The series aspires to promote works that use the nexus “law & politics” as a prism that allows understanding societal dynamics beyond the deep-seated borders separating purely legal from purely political methodologies. It welcomes theoretically informed and empirically grounded analyses that foster the development of theory in the study of juridico-political processes.
The qualifier “Continental” signifies not so much a geographical or socio-historical feature as a methodological one. The approach that the series aims to promote, regardless of the nationality of prospective authors, materializes at the intersection between the vocabularies and methodologies of legal and political theories. In other words, the starting point of this approach is that the interplay between legal and political processes provides a precious lens to observe and comprehend contemporary societal phenomena.
More specifically, submissions exploring the following themes are welcomed:
The relationship between the legal and the political spheres from a theoretical, historical and/or empirical point of view.
The transformation of sovereignty.
The transformation of the state and the rise of non-state political and organizational structures that break the ties with modern statehood.
Exceptionalism and emergency at the domestic and/or the global level.
The downfall of conventional juridico-political binaries: public/private, state/civil society, domestic/international, religious/secular and others.
Current transformations of formal constitutions and the separation of powers.
Issues related to the increasing spread of legal pluralism and global legal pluralism.
Strategies and politics of legal elites and the new role of judicial bodies both nationally and internationally.
Analyses of key Continental authors who have brought to light the “materiality” of the law, such as Giorgio Agamben, Hannah Arendt, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Marcel Gauchet, Antonio Gramsci, Jürgen Habermas, Reinhart Koselleck, Antonio Negri, Carl Schmitt and others.
Analyses of key Continental “classics” whose voice is unheard or underrepresented in the Anglophone academic and publishing environment, such as Walter Benjamin, Léon Duguit, Georges Gurvitch, Maurice Hauriou, Hermann Heller, Georg Jellinek, Ernst Jünger, Costantino Mortati, Georges Renard, Santi Romano, Rudolf Smend, Simone Weil and others.
This interdisciplinary series welcomes monographs and edited volumes that engage with the conceptual and empirical questions detailed above and discussions of how the contamination of jurisprudential and theoretical-political approaches helps illuminate current national and global processes.