(2012) 25:4 Ratio Juris is available on Wiley
Online Library.
Of particular interest to members might be John Eekelaar's Positivism
and Plural Legal Systems (pages 513–526):
This paper considers whether the positivist account of law is useful in
guiding states in how they should deal with religious or customary legal
orders followed by minority groups within their jurisdiction. It
argues, first, that such orders can be said to exist despite the
prevalence of disagreement about the grounds of law. It then argues,
contrary to views advanced by Scott Shapiro and Joseph Raz, that there
are good reasons for perceiving that the resolution of legal disputes by
reference to moral principle involves the application of pre-existing
law. However, the paper concludes by arguing that the Social Thesis has an important role in supplying the basis upon which the application of law can be deemed to be legitimate, and that this has relevance to the way states might respond to minority legal orders.
|
▼
No comments:
Post a Comment